Select Page

The backlash against using student test scores to evaluate teachers continues to gain momentum, with Georgia among the latest states changing their policies. In a unanimous vote, the Georgia State Board decided to diminish the role of student test scores.

Before the vote, student performance made up 50 percent of teacher evaluation outcomes. With the change, it will make up 30 percent of a teacher’s score. The remainder will consist of classroom observations (50 percent) and teacher’s growth (20 percent).

The development points to a general consensus that student growth and student test scores still are significant factors in determining a teacher’s performance, but perhaps should not be the predominate factor.

According to the National Council on Teacher Quality, 27 states required annual evaluations for all teachers in 2015, compared to just 15 states in 2009. However, 45 states require that new teachers who are still in a probationary period undergo teacher evaluations every year. And of those states, 17 factor in student growth as the “preponderant criterion” in teacher evaluations, according to a report. Student growth was a “significant criterion” for teacher evaluations in 18 other states.

In New York, a law was recently passed that emphasized state test scores in evaluations. Shortly after that enactment, policymakers for education decided to take away the ability to use state test scores at all. This came in response to the governor feeling that the inclusion of state test scores in teacher evaluations was being used to provide higher ratings to perhaps less-deserving teachers.

According to the Center for Public Education, most states use student scores from state standardized tests, but many also combine this data with other measures.

After all was said and done, with critics arguing that the emphasis on state test scores was unreasonable, the decision was made by the state education department to give teachers two evaluations. One includes test scores, but will have no consequences for the teacher. The other, using different standards for evaluations, can have an effect on an educator’s tenure and possible termination.

Negotiations are underway between districts and teacher’s unions to come to agreement on what those evaluations will cover and what they consider as fair ways to evaluate teachers.

Featured Articles

Education Advanced acquires Standard For Success

Education Advanced acquires Standard For Success

Education Advanced, Inc. (EAI), a leading provider of operations management and workflow solutions for K-12 school districts, announced today the acquisition of Indiana-based Standard for Success (SFS), an independently owned company, founded by teachers, to support educators and administrators with software, services, and solutions.

read more
Graduation Pathways FAQ

Graduation Pathways FAQ

Indiana school advisors, administrators, counselors, and principals all have the important task of tracking graduation pathways for their students. In fact, the Indiana State...

read more
Make the Most of an Evaluation Walkthrough

Make the Most of an Evaluation Walkthrough

In order to provide the most effective learning environment possible, educators need ongoing evaluation and feedback. An evaluation walkthrough is an assessment tool that you can use to provide valuable data regarding how well the implementation of standards-based instruction is occurring. A walkthrough protocol needs to be established to make sure the data is retrieved, examined, and analyzed as efficiently as possible. The following explains the steps to take to successfully implement this process.

read more
Coronavirus and the Impact on High School Graduation

Coronavirus and the Impact on High School Graduation

The beginning of the pandemic in 2020 had major unexpected effects on many aspects of our lives. Unfortunately, this had a huge impact on children’s education, which moved students and educators to remote classrooms online instead of the traditional in-class school days we are all accustomed to.

read more