Select Page

The following is an excerpt from Chapter 18: “Finalizations” of Dr. Dianna Whitlock’s published book, “Teacher Evaluation as a Growth Process.” To purchase the full book, visit Amazon or Barnes&Noble.

Part 3, Chapter 18: Finalizations

With data collected, conferences conducted, and feedback given throughout the year, the time will come for the administrator to make a judgement based upon evidence, or a finalization. The finalization is the analysis of all data to assign a final rating, or ranking, for an individual teacher. This final ranking is usually assigned by the building administrator, using data from not only their observations, but all secondary evaluators who have gathered observational data. 

It is crucial to realize that in many cases, this final rating score is all that district level administrators, school board members, and state legislative bodies see in regard to teacher evaluation. Therefore, it is vital that administrators are encompassing all collected data when assigning this final score. While we encourage all parties involved in teacher evaluation to drill down the data and analyze the specific areas of strengths and challenges of teachers, this is often not a required reporting component.  

An average, or a progression?

When working with schools on their evaluation process, I often am asked if our evaluation platform will average the data, giving the administrator a final number, and therefore eliminating even more guesswork or subjectivity. At first examination, this seems like a perfect solution. But upon closer examination, this may not be what we want to support a culture of growth. Let’s look at a hypothetical example of assigning finalizations.

A school has conducted all observations, approved artifacts, conducted pre and post conferences, set goals for teacher professional development, and is now ready to assign teachers a final number reflective of their yearly performance. Principal Sky, who is the primary evaluator, has ensured that all observational data has been entered into the management system, and as a result has a numerical average for each teacher. Principal Sky sits down after school one afternoon to look at the ratings for two of his struggling teachers, Miss Sunshine and Mr. Moon, who have both received an average score of 2, placing them in the Improvement Needed category, per the district’s rubric.  

Upon closer examination, Principal Sky finds that observations for Miss Sunshine have been marked consistently by multiple evaluators as mostly 2’s throughout the year. Miss Sunshine has also not submitted many artifacts supporting her professional development or growth throughout the year. For these reasons, Principal Sky feels that her average rating is fair and reflective of a rating of Improvement Needed for a final rating, represented by a 2.

To continue reading the full study findings, click here to purchase the full book.

Featured Articles

Ten Years and Counting…

Ten Years and Counting…

SFS celebrates a decade of success in providing education evaluation to develop better teachers, better students, and a better world.

read more
Transformations and New Roles at Standard For Success

Transformations and New Roles at Standard For Success

Standard For Success is known for being a progressive, ever-changing organization that evolves in response to customer needs. In that spirit, we are pleased to announce some internal changes to our staffing roles to better meet the needs of our clients.

read more
Senior Sales Representative

Senior Sales Representative

After ten solid years of growth, we are expanding the sales function of our organization, enabling further scale and even faster growth in service of our mission. That mission is to build better teachers, better students, and a better world. We’d like to invite you to join us.

read more
SFS New Administrator Training Registration

SFS New Administrator Training Registration

This training meets the evaluation training required by Indiana code. The training will be provided by experienced, licensed Indiana administrators that have helped administrators complete over 1 million evaluations since the new legislation in 2011.

read more
Standard For Success Inks Agreement to License the Danielson Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument

SFS Accreditation Enhancement and Features

SFS Accreditation management product has grown exponentially in the past year based upon those suggestions from our early adopters, and we’re proud to be able to highlight some of our most popular features for you.

read more
Summer:  Time to Refresh!

Summer: Time to Refresh!

Ah, June. The promise of a whole summer lies ahead. Students are more than ready for a break, teachers are finishing end of year tasks, and administrators might even get the...

read more
Quality Program and Curriculum Evaluation

Quality Program and Curriculum Evaluation

SFS can customize a rubric based upon best standards or your curricular standards. This allows a district to track areas of strength and challenge within a program, and be documented and utilized to guarantee excellent programming to families.

read more