Select Page

The following is an excerpt from Dr Dianna Whitlock’s published book, “Teacher Evaluation as a Growth Process.” To purchase the full book, visit Amazon or Barnes&Noble.

Part 1, Chapter 3: Historical Data

The previous chapter gave us reasons to evaluate.  In this chapter, we examine the backstory, or historical perspectives that brought us to these revelations and changed the way we evaluate. We mentioned that prior to 2010, there had been little change to the evaluation process. Prior to 2010, teacher evaluations were only truly utilized and monitored for teacher dismissal. In addition, there was a “lack of urgency” (Andrews, 2016, Powerpoint slide 5) when analyzing teacher and administrator evaluations, as schools and legislators concentrated on implementing school improvement initiatives that focused solely on instructional practices and student achievement scores.

The theory of lack of urgency refers to Jon Kotter’s work which states, “The basic pattern is simple:  urgency leads to success leads to complacency.” (Kotter, 2008, p. 170). In the early stages of an organization, all parties involved are working long hours striving toward a common goal.  This may be a targeted sales number, or success of a specific initiative.  It is during these times of high urgency that we often produce our best work. Once the goal or quota is met, there is a tendency to backslide a little in terms of productivity. The goal of any organization, in Kotter’s theory, is to create and maintain this high sense of urgency while not over stressing or burning out your best employees (Kotter, 2008).

In the school setting, we often see this occur in reference to student test scores or school grades.  Often the school that strives to become a high-ranking school according to the mandated metric will reach the goal one year, only to regress the next.

In regard to teacher evaluation, we saw this lack of urgency from busy administrators and veteran teachers alike.  If teachers were doing well (success), administrators may be willing to remove their focus from teacher evaluations (complacency) and instead spend time on a more pressing initiative.

I do not believe that administrators intentionally ignored teacher evaluation. How many times, as a school administrator, have we set as a goal to work on teacher evaluations on our morning drive to school, only to arrive at our offices and be greeted by those daily management tasks that take us away from our position as an instructional leader?

To continue reading, click here to purchase the full book.

Featured Articles

Mentors Make a Difference

Mentors Make a Difference

Mentorship is a very important step in retaining new teachers in the profession. Having someone to talk to and learn from, who have already been in their situations, leads to success for new teachers. Having the right mentor for a new teacher can make a big difference in their career.

read more
My First Quarter with SFS

My First Quarter with SFS

Our mission is simple – help busy administrators save time, drive performance, and focus on what they do best: being great educators.

read more
Is It Any Different Than Mowing Yards?

Is It Any Different Than Mowing Yards?

SFS may have started with a mission to make teacher evaluations “simple and meaningful” in Indiana, but we have grown into an international company that is working to contribute to a Better World. At SFS we will not stop innovating, driving, and working for you so EVERY educator and student can “win!”

read more
4th Quarter Accreditation Enhancements

4th Quarter Accreditation Enhancements

Here at SFS Accreditation our development of new features and enhancements continues to be driven by our client’s suggestions.   We’re proud to be able to highlight some of our newest features for you.

read more
The Importance of Clean Data

The Importance of Clean Data

Standard for Success is here to help clear the pathway to graduation! Join us on our mission to build better teachers, better students, and a better world.

read more