Select Page

The following is an excerpt from Dr Dianna Whitlock’s published book, “Teacher Evaluation as a Growth Process.” To purchase the full book, visit Amazon or Barnes&Noble.

Part 1, Chapter 4: Rubrics

The use of the rubric itself is new to many involved in teacher evaluation.  As we explained in previous chapters, many school districts were using narratives until recent years.  Some districts may have elected to use a checklist that included a four-point scale.  However, most of these did not define each indicator.  For example, common checklists in the early years of teacher evaluation may have required that a teacher be rated on student engagement by asking the evaluator to check a 1, 2, 3, or 4.  However, many did not define what the 1, 2, 3, or 4 looked like to the evaluator.  This made the evaluation practice only slightly more objective than the narrative format. From a teacher perspective, feedback was limited, because they were not informed of the expectations required to earn a specific mark in student engagement.

A rubric, by definition is:

  • an established rule, tradition, or custom or
  • a guide listing specific criteria for grading or scoring academic papers, projects, or tests

(Merriam-Webster, 2019).

Both of these definitions can be applied when we are talking about teacher evaluation rubrics.  The first definition, that which includes an established rule, is exactly what districts do when they adopt, adapt, or write a teacher evaluation rubric.  They are establishing the rules by which they expect teachers to perform, improve, and excel.

When we typically think of academic rubrics, we may think of the second definition as it applies to scoring student work.  However, when we evaluate a teacher based upon a pre-approved rubric, we are indeed providing feedback based upon a set of pre-determined standards.  In this case, the project is the teacher’s classroom performance.

To delve a little deeper, we can refer to the educational philosophical construct of essentialism.  Supporters of essentialism believe that there is a “body of specific knowledge and absolute standards of thought” (Cooper, et al., 2004). This seems to be the basis for application of any academic standards or rubric, especially as they relate to teacher evaluation.  Teacher evaluation rubrics and student academic standards set absolutes for performance.

In response to changes in teacher evaluation mandates and state level reporting, some states and individual districts began creating teacher rubrics.  The purpose of these rubrics was to provide a uniform platform with which to evaluate teachers.  Many school districts chose to adopt research-based rubrics presently available.  While the rubrics discussed in this chapter are not all-inclusive, we will attempt to examine some of the most commonly used rubrics in the field of education.

It is necessary to distinguish some terminology at this point.  While we have defined a rubric, it is important to note that this is only a small portion of the entire evaluation process explained in this book.  Simply adopting a rubric is a single, though critical, step in this practice.

To continue reading, click here to purchase the full book.

Featured Articles

Ten Years and Counting…

Ten Years and Counting…

SFS celebrates a decade of success in providing education evaluation to develop better teachers, better students, and a better world.

read more
Transformations and New Roles at Standard For Success

Transformations and New Roles at Standard For Success

Standard For Success is known for being a progressive, ever-changing organization that evolves in response to customer needs. In that spirit, we are pleased to announce some internal changes to our staffing roles to better meet the needs of our clients.

read more
Senior Sales Representative

Senior Sales Representative

After ten solid years of growth, we are expanding the sales function of our organization, enabling further scale and even faster growth in service of our mission. That mission is to build better teachers, better students, and a better world. We’d like to invite you to join us.

read more
SFS New Administrator Training Registration

SFS New Administrator Training Registration

This training meets the evaluation training required by Indiana code. The training will be provided by experienced, licensed Indiana administrators that have helped administrators complete over 1 million evaluations since the new legislation in 2011.

read more
Standard For Success Inks Agreement to License the Danielson Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument

SFS Accreditation Enhancement and Features

SFS Accreditation management product has grown exponentially in the past year based upon those suggestions from our early adopters, and we’re proud to be able to highlight some of our most popular features for you.

read more
Summer:  Time to Refresh!

Summer: Time to Refresh!

Ah, June. The promise of a whole summer lies ahead. Students are more than ready for a break, teachers are finishing end of year tasks, and administrators might even get the...

read more
Quality Program and Curriculum Evaluation

Quality Program and Curriculum Evaluation

SFS can customize a rubric based upon best standards or your curricular standards. This allows a district to track areas of strength and challenge within a program, and be documented and utilized to guarantee excellent programming to families.

read more