Select Page

Throughout many trainings on teacher evaluation, a question I often hear asked surrounds the idea of averaging marks in a teacher observation and evaluation. Is it good, or not so good, to do that? Based on conversations that I have had with administrators, there is no right or wrong answer, but rather some things to think about:

  1. The purpose behind an evaluation process is not to catch a teacher redhanded, and it is not something done to them. Rather, it exists to create better teachers and is a process best completed alongside them.
  2. It is imperative that an administrator understand the evidence, what the various levels of the rubric mean, and that good teaching skills may be observed over many different areas and in places other than the classroom.
  3. The observation and evaluation promotes professional learning.

A suggested, strong process for teacher evaluation includes two things:

1. Good Judgement
The administrator observes and will use good professional judgment to decide which competencies matter the most for teachers, in different contexts, and how teachers have evolved over the course of the year. Here’s a good example:

In the first observation of the year, the teacher was rated Ineffective at Checks for Understanding. By the second observation at the end of the year, the administrator has worked with that teacher and given them activities to increase ability in this area, so the teacher was rated Effective.

If those two scores were averaged, the teacher would be considered Improvement Necessary. That is not really where that teacher should be leveled. If the teacher’s practice grew over the year and they have responded to feedback, then teacher has improved. Therefore, their summative rating should be Effective.

2. Teacher Reflection
The teacher is given the opportunity for reflection on the evaluation and is given opportunities for professional conversations to enhance skills.

Whatever the decision (to average, or not to average), the whole process should be geared towards creating Better Teachers, Better Students, Better World.


SOURCES

https://danielsongroup.org/

www.doe.in.gov

Featured Articles

Education Advanced acquires Standard For Success

Education Advanced acquires Standard For Success

Education Advanced, Inc. (EAI), a leading provider of operations management and workflow solutions for K-12 school districts, announced today the acquisition of Indiana-based Standard for Success (SFS), an independently owned company, founded by teachers, to support educators and administrators with software, services, and solutions.

read more
Graduation Pathways FAQ

Graduation Pathways FAQ

Indiana school advisors, administrators, counselors, and principals all have the important task of tracking graduation pathways for their students. In fact, the Indiana State...

read more
Make the Most of an Evaluation Walkthrough

Make the Most of an Evaluation Walkthrough

In order to provide the most effective learning environment possible, educators need ongoing evaluation and feedback. An evaluation walkthrough is an assessment tool that you can use to provide valuable data regarding how well the implementation of standards-based instruction is occurring. A walkthrough protocol needs to be established to make sure the data is retrieved, examined, and analyzed as efficiently as possible. The following explains the steps to take to successfully implement this process.

read more
Coronavirus and the Impact on High School Graduation

Coronavirus and the Impact on High School Graduation

The beginning of the pandemic in 2020 had major unexpected effects on many aspects of our lives. Unfortunately, this had a huge impact on children’s education, which moved students and educators to remote classrooms online instead of the traditional in-class school days we are all accustomed to.

read more