Select Page

Would you ever consider your teachers as nothing more than widgets? Although most principals and school officials would respond with a resounding “No,” it appears that the so-called
“Widget Effect” still applies to how teachers are treated, according to a new study released by Matthew Kraft and Allison Gilmour.

The researchers said that little has changed since 2009. That’s when TNTP released a study that showed administrators often treat teachers as interchangeable components — widgets, in effect. The original report, called “The Widget Effect: Our National Failure to Acknowledge and Act on Differences in Teacher Effectiveness,” was based on 15,000 teachers and 1,300 administrators. Here are some of the main findings:

Generic ratings: All teachers are rated good or great, with less than 1 percent of teachers earning unsatisfactory ratings. Teachers who are exceptional are lumped with all the others.

Poor performers are not addressed: About 50 percent of the districts in the study had not dismissed a tenured teacher for poor performance in the previous five years.

Inadequacies in professional development: Following their last evaluation, nearly 3 out of 4 teachers did not receive specific feedback on how to improve their performance.

Lack of training for new teachers: Expectations were too low for new teachers, leading to neglect in helping them make progress and earn tenure.

Poor performance goes unaddressed: Half of the districts studied had not dismissed a single tenured teacher for poor performance in the previous five years.

New study findings

In conducting the research, Kraft and Gilmour wanted to determine if teacher evaluation reforms resulted in any meaningful outcomes with teacher performance ratings and if the ratings better reflected perceptions about teacher effectiveness.

In spite of reforms, many of the previous behaviors surrounding teacher evaluations are still apparent — 7 years after the initial “Widget Effect” report. For instance, based on evaluator surveys, 27.8 percent of teachers were estimated at performing at a level below Proficient. Yet, that estimate proved to be four times as high as the percentage of teachers who actually received the lower rating.

When asked about their reluctance to rate teachers more accurately by giving a below Proficient rating, administrators and other evaluators noted that they didn’t have the time to document performance and provide the needed support for the teachers’ professional growth. Others said that it would require a significant amount of observations to justify the rating.

One middle school principal told the researchers, “I just feel like sometimes you have to have a lot of detail before you can give somebody a ‘Needs Improvement.’”

Other reasons for not giving the lower rating included the teachers seemed to have potential for improvement, avoidance of emotional conversations to explain the low ratings, and concerns about finding replacements.

Featured Articles

Education Advanced acquires Standard For Success

Education Advanced acquires Standard For Success

Education Advanced, Inc. (EAI), a leading provider of operations management and workflow solutions for K-12 school districts, announced today the acquisition of Indiana-based Standard for Success (SFS), an independently owned company, founded by teachers, to support educators and administrators with software, services, and solutions.

read more
Graduation Pathways FAQ

Graduation Pathways FAQ

Indiana school advisors, administrators, counselors, and principals all have the important task of tracking graduation pathways for their students. In fact, the Indiana State...

read more
Make the Most of an Evaluation Walkthrough

Make the Most of an Evaluation Walkthrough

In order to provide the most effective learning environment possible, educators need ongoing evaluation and feedback. An evaluation walkthrough is an assessment tool that you can use to provide valuable data regarding how well the implementation of standards-based instruction is occurring. A walkthrough protocol needs to be established to make sure the data is retrieved, examined, and analyzed as efficiently as possible. The following explains the steps to take to successfully implement this process.

read more
Coronavirus and the Impact on High School Graduation

Coronavirus and the Impact on High School Graduation

The beginning of the pandemic in 2020 had major unexpected effects on many aspects of our lives. Unfortunately, this had a huge impact on children’s education, which moved students and educators to remote classrooms online instead of the traditional in-class school days we are all accustomed to.

read more